What 200 Leaders Taught Me About Integrity (And Why Most Leadership Frameworks Miss the Point)
There was a moment I almost walked away from writing this book.
I was sitting in my study, surrounded by stacks of leadership models. The 4 C’s of this, the 7 C’s of that, endless iterations of frameworks promising to unlock executive presence, emotional intelligence, and strategic thinking. My desk looked like the aftermath of a business school explosion.
And then I had to laugh at myself. Because what I was about to propose? The Leadership Integrity Framework? It has four Ps—Purpose, Presence, Partnership, Perspective.
Yes, I know. Another framework with alliterative P’s. I experimented with different ways to name the four dimensions. I tried acronyms like GRIP—Grounding, something with R I can’t quite remember now, Interconnectedness, and Perspective. I played with more symbolic names that felt less definitional. But I kept coming back to Purpose, Presence, Partnership, Perspective, not because the alliteration was clever, but because these words, despite their limitations, pointed most clearly to what I was seeing in the work. They’re simple enough to remember, specific enough to be useful, and they capture the essential territory each dimension covers.
They’re showing you how everything you already know fits together.
Fair warning: This framework asks something of you that most behavioral models don’t. It requires you to hold paradox, sit with ambiguity, question your own certainty. If you’re looking for a checklist or a guaranteed process, this might not be for you. Yet.
But if you’ve reached a place in your leadership where the old models feel too simple, where you sense there’s something deeper to integrate, where you’re ready to work with complexity instead of trying to eliminate it, this framework can help you see what you’ve been sensing but couldn’t quite name.

